Ursula Le Guin is such a great writer in so many ways. I love how she is able to plumb the depths of our humanity and inhumanity. Here's an excerpt from the story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas." To know where the picture fits in, you'll have to read the story, which you can do here.
The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas
Joyous! How is one to tell about joy? How describe the
citizens of Omelas?
They were not simple folk, you see, though they were happy.
But we do not say the words of cheer much any more. All smiles have become
archaic. Given a description such as this one tends to make certain
assumptions. Given a description such as this one tends to look next for the
King, mounted on a splendid stallion and surrounded by his noble knights, or
perhaps in a golden litter borne by great-muscled slaves. But there was no
king. They did not use swords, or keep slaves. They were not barbarians. I do not
know the rules and laws of their society, but I suspect that they were
singularly few. As they did without monarchy and slavery, so they also got on
without the stock exchange, the advertisement, the secret police, and the bomb.
Yet I repeat that these were not simple folk, not dulcet shepherds, noble
savages, bland utopians. They were not less complex than us. The trouble is
that we have a bad habit, encouraged by pedants and sophisticates, of
considering happiness as something rather stupid. Only pain is intellectual,
only evil interesting. This is the treason of the artist: a refusal to admit
the banality of evil and the terrible boredom of pain. If you can't lick 'em,
join 'em. If it hurts, repeat it. But to praise despair is to condemn delight,
to embrace violence is to lose hold of everything else. We have almost lost
hold; we can no longer describe a happy man, nor make any celebration of joy.
How can I tell you about the people of Omelas? They were not naive and happy
children--though their children were, in fact, happy. They were mature,
intelligent, passionate adults whose lives were not wretched. O miracle! but I
wish I could describe it better. I wish I could convince you. Omelas sounds in
my words like a city in a fairy tale, long ago and far away, once upon a time. Perhaps
it would be best if you imagined it as your own fancy bids, assuming it will
rise to the occasion, for certainly I cannot suit you all. For instance, how
about technology? I think that there would be no cars or helicopters in and
above the streets; this follows from the fact that the people of Omelas are
happy people. Happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary,
what is neither necessary nor destructive, and what is destructive. In the
middle category, however--that of the unnecessary but undestructive, that of
comfort, luxury, exuberance, etc.--they could perfectly well have central
heating, subway trains, washing machines, and all kinds of marvelous devices not
yet invented here, floating light-sources, fuelless power, a cure for the
common cold. Or they could have none of that; it doesn't matter. As you like
it. I incline to think that people from towns up and down the coast have been
coming in to Omelas during the last days before the Festival on very fast
little trains and double-decked trams, and that the train station of Omelas is
actually the handsomest building in town, though plainer than the magnificent
Farmers' Market. But even granted trains, I fear that Omelas so far strikes
some of you as goody-goody. Smiles, bells, parades, horses, bleh. If so, please
add an orgy. If an orgy would help, don't hesitate. Let us not, however, have
temples from which issue beautiful nude priests and priestesses already half in
ecstasy and ready to copulate with any man or woman, lover or stranger, who
desires union with the deep godhead of the blood, although that was my first
idea. But really it would be better not to have any temples in Omelas--at
least, not manned temples. Religion yes, clergy no. Surely the beautiful nudes
can just wander about, offering themselves like divine soufflés to the hunger
of the needy and the rapture of the flesh. Let them join the processions. Let
tambourines be struck above the copulations, and the glory of desire be
proclaimed upon the gongs, and (a not unimportant point) let the offspring of
these delightful rituals be beloved and looked after by all. One thing I know
there is none of in Omelas is guilt. But what else should there be? I thought
at first there were not drugs, but that is puritanical. For those who like it,
the faint insistent sweetness of drooz may perfume the ways of the city, drooz
which first brings a great lightness and brilliance to the mind and limbs, and
then after some hours a dreamy languor, and wonderful visions at last of the
very arcana and inmost secrets of the Universe, as well as exciting the pleasure
of sex beyond belief; and it is not habit-forming. For more modest tastes I
think there ought to be beer. What else, what else belongs in the joyous city?
The sense of victory, surely, the celebration of courage. But as we did without
clergy, let us do without soldiers. The joy built upon successful slaughter is
not the right kind of joy; it will not do; it is fearful and it is trivial. A
boundless and generous contentment, a magnanimous triumph felt not against some
outer enemy but in communion with the finest and fairest in the souls of all
men everywhere and the splendor of the world's summer: this is what swells the
hearts of the people of Omelas, and the victory they celebrate is that of life.
I really don't think many of them need to take drooz.
No comments:
Post a Comment