I love her point about being a ham-and-egger writer ~ not one of the lauded greats, but as good as you can be. I think it's a healthy attitude to take, and I would imagine some who are considered great continue to see flaws in their work and also think of themselves as ham-and-eggers. It's part of the motivation to write ~ to get better, to try to realize the vision you had for the work in your mind but that's never achieved.
I also love her point about the baseball player Tommy Hottovy, the left-handed pitcher:
Tommy's task is harder than mine. There are more published novelists in the country than there are major-league baseball players, who number 750 at any given moment in the season. And your chances of publishing a novel don't depend on whether Don DeLillo or Lorrie Moore breaks an arm that season. I toil on projects that don't work out, but my rejectionas and failures are private. While Tommy struggled and rehabbed, every armchair manager in Red Sox Nation with a blog wrote about how old he's getting (he's twenty-eight). I couldn't take that. I could only imagine reading on some blog while I worked on my novel: "How old's Shank? Thirty-three? And she's got two kids? She's never going to make it. Stick a fork in her."Now that's some great and insightful ~ not to mention entertaining ~ writing. Thanks Jenny!
Questions of the Day: Are you a ham-and-egger?
2 comments:
I agree with you about Jenny's essay. It's a winner! Full of great insights and is very appropriate to that particular issue of P&W: The Inspiration Issue.
Thanks Tamara and David! I feel really lucky that Poets & Writers published that essay. And it was a lot of fun to write.
Post a Comment