Not actually my son ;) (via) |
My son’s been giving me a bad time lately. He’ll say, “Mommy, it’s all your fault.” He’ll drop his bread on the floor or make a mess or nothing at all will happen, and he’ll say, “It’s your fault, Mommy.” He’s joking, I know he’s joking, and he knows that I know he’s joking. All in good fun, and we laugh.
But I was thinking about the social agreements we make, the
way we agree on what’s “normal” and what’s acceptable ~ which amounts to the
assumptions we make. You know how a couple will have a certain way they do
things. She stays at home with the kids
and does all the housework and he goes out to his job but doesn’t have to do
any housework or “help” with the kids.
Or he does the cooking and she does the laundry and they share taking
care of the kids. Or he’s the primary
caregiver to the kids because she can’t handle it for long. You get the
picture.
We personally have these agreements between us, but then
society, too, has agreements. The
idealized nuclear family is an agreement: wife keeps the home and kids while husband
goes to a job outside the home. All this
is, however, is an agreement, and these things change over time.
What’s interesting about all this is that we often take
those agreements we’ve been handed by our parents and never question them. The nuclear family is how it “should”
be. Two people of the same sex having a
loving relationship and getting married? Inconceivable. It’s inconceivable because that’s the
agreement we’ve inherited and we take the status quo as “normal” and “acceptable,”
and anything outside that is “unnatural” or the other.
I was particularly struck yesterday by a number of articles
I read that illustrated this. One was
from the Guardian ~ and I can’t seem to find it now ~ about a man who raped and
killed his wife. The point of the opinion
piece was that we blame the rape victim and tell her (or him) that they should
have done something different, that it was their fault. By saying that, we’re setting normal that
way, rather than saying the rapist is the one who is responsible for his own
actions. He (and it is most often a “he”)
should be held accountable rather than the victim. Another was about the practice of
gaslighting, named from the iconic 1944 MGM film, where you call a person crazy
and discount their feelings and thoughts so much that they question their own
impulses. A third one was about a woman
who witnessed a man undermining another young woman and her writing, and how
the woman took the chance and pointed out the gaslighting. A lot in the news
about this type lately.
It takes a lot to change these givens. First you’ve got to understand what’s going
on and then you’ve got to call people out on it. You’ve got to make boundaries and change
normal to something that takes your reality into account. It’s really hard to do ~ on a personal level
and on a societal level.
That’s a little of what my son is doing ~ gaslighting. We all do it to varying degrees. It’s all in good fun, but it’s also a way to
control your world, to try to get your way.
It’s a way to nudge the agreement.
1 comment:
So happy to see you on twitter.
Really enjoyed your post, also loved the movie "Gaslight," with Ingrid bergman and charles Boyer.
@OpinionsToGo
Post a Comment